Manual cap placement
Manual placement can suit short runs and lower budgets, especially where closures are awkward or formats change frequently.
Cap feeding guide
Cap feeding can make or break a capping project. The best route depends on cap geometry, output, budget and whether operators can place caps manually.
Manual placement can suit short runs and lower budgets, especially where closures are awkward or formats change frequently.
Elevators can reduce operator handling and supply caps to a bowl, chute or placement mechanism depending on the project.
Bowl feeders can orient closures for automatic placement when the closure shape is suitable and output justifies the investment.
Shortlist route
Use this as a starting point before sending bottle, cap and output details for a project-specific recommendation.
| Requirement | Likely route | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Small batches | Manual placement | Lower capital cost and simpler changeovers. |
| Consistent cap format | Elevator or bowl feed | Supports more automatic operation and higher output. |
| Triggers and pumps | Project-specific feed system | Dip tubes and closure height often need careful handling. |
FAQ
No. Some semi-automatic and lower-output systems use manual cap placement.
Sometimes, but trigger shape, dip tube length and orientation requirements need to be tested.
Send cap samples, bottle samples, target output, photos of the current line and expected format range.
Ready to shortlist?
Lancing UK will help identify whether you need a semi-automatic capper, compact capper, inline spindle capper or specialist cap feeding route.