Manual placement
Simple and flexible but labour-heavy at sustained output.
Cap feeding
Cap feeding can decide whether a capping line is truly automatic. Use this page to compare manual cap placement, elevators, chutes and bowl feeders before requesting a quote.
Simple and flexible but labour-heavy at sustained output.
Useful where caps can be lifted and presented into a chute or pickup route.
Best considered where orientation, sorting and continuous cap presentation are critical.
Shortlist route
Use these checks to decide whether the project is a semi-automatic, compact or automatic inline capping route.
| Project signal | Likely route | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Low output and many cap types | Manual cap placement | Keeps the system simple while changeovers remain easy. |
| Repeat cap format | Cap elevator or chute | Reduces manual handling and supports more consistent output. |
| Orientation-sensitive caps | Bowl feeder or project-specific feed | Helps present caps correctly before tightening. |
Related routes
FAQ
No. Low-volume work may use manual placement, while automatic lines often need a feed route.
Sometimes, but cap diameter, height, weight and shape must be checked.
Send loose caps, closed caps, any liners, caps from multiple batches and the target output.
Ready to shortlist?
Lancing UK will help identify whether you need a semi-automatic capper, compact capper, inline spindle capper or specialist cap feeding route.